Reports

_SunDust_

Active Member
Crafter
Dec 16, 2013
1,812
3
38
New Zealand
#1
I remember when I was just trial mod, and reading somewhere about the information with give in our reports if we didn't have the proof of the player doing so and so owners had to unbanned these players cause mods did not give enough proof.  Or has this changed now?  Or are we getting slack?

If I was one of those players permanently banned and made an appeal saying /co I was witness is good but then showing no proof or any screenshots whatsoever lacks strength in keeping a player permanently banned, as they probably rightfully need to be but then again we only have the mods word for it.  

Tell me I'm wrong and ill accept that, and will do it like that from now on.

What are your thoughts?
 

Ar7ific1al

Active Member
Supporter
Crafter
Dec 15, 2013
985
6
38
26
#2
Before and after pics are a plus, and screenshots of the rollback are necessary.
 

crackers1097

Member
Crafter
Feb 8, 2014
446
7
18
Minnesota
#3
Witnesses always seemed a lackluster point of evidence. What if you found a grief by yourself?
Screenshots of proof of block removal and rollback name/count should be enough for any case. They're free to appeal, however, and you should take that into consideration.
 

Users Who Are Viewing This Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 1)